Utilities Inc - North Folsom Hills
On record since 2009: 48 violations. 1 treatment lapse · 18 missed or late tests · 29 notices or reports. Most recent began 2019-07-01.
None of them is a measurement of contaminated water.
For this year's test results, ask the utility for its annual Consumer Confidence Report. Every community system must publish one.
More violations on record than 92% of active water systems in Louisiana. Small systems with no staff chemist often rack up missed-test violations; big utilities rarely do.
The record, year by year
Across Louisiana, 31% of violations are missed or late tests and 25% are water over a limit.
Lead & copper at the tap
Utilities sample taps in homes most likely to have lead pipes, and report the 90th-percentile result: 9 in 10 homes sampled came in at or below this number. Above the red line (the action level) the utility must act. The action level is not a safe level; EPA's health goal for lead is zero. EPA's file does not date these results, so they are shown highest first.
Lead, 90th percentile 7 results on file · action level 15 ppb
Every violation on record
- 2019-07-01Lead and Copper RuleWQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-ComplianceBack in compliance
- 2014-12-01Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2014-12-01Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2014-09-01Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2014-09-01Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2014-04-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2014-03-07Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2014-03-05Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2014-02-06Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2014-01-08Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2014-01-01Lead and Copper RuleInitial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuBack in compliance
- 2013-12-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-11-19Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-11-13Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-10-11Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-10-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Inadequate ReportingBack in compliance
- 2013-09-09Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-08-08Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-07-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2013-07-01Lead and Copper RuleInitial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuBack in compliance
- 2013-06-06Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-05-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-05-09Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-04-11Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
Show the other 23 entries
- 2013-03-14Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-02-08Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-01-16Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2013-01-01Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2013-01-01Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2013-01-01Lead and Copper RuleInitial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuBack in compliance
- 2012-12-14Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2012-11-12Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2012-10-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Inadequate ReportingBack in compliance
- 2012-07-01Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2012-07-01Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2012-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2012-07-01Lead and Copper RuleInitial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuBack in compliance
- 2012-05-31Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2011-10-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Inadequate ReportingBack in compliance
- 2011-07-01Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2011-07-01Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2011-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2011-04-12Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2010-07-01Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2010-07-01Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2010-01-01Lead and Copper RuleInitial Tap Sampling for Pb and CuBack in compliance
- 2009-12-17E. ColiMonitoring, Source Water (GWR)Back in compliance
System details
| Population served | 81 |
| Service connections | 27 |
| Water source | Groundwater |
| System type | Community Water System |
| Owner | Private |
| Status | Active |
| City | Mandeville |
| EPA ZIP on file | 70471 |
Areas served
- Washington Parish
Reading this record
Utilities Inc - North Folsom Hills is a community water system that draws from groundwater and serves about 81 people in Mandeville, Louisiana. Everything above comes from the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), where states report every violation by every public water system.
Four kinds of violation. Only one is a measurement of the water: over the limit means a test came back above a legal maximum (an MCL). A treatment lapse means a required protective step was not done, such as disinfection, filtration, fixing a defect an inspector found, or filing a lead-pipe inventory. A missed or late test means a required test was skipped or never reported. That is the most common kind, and the most misread: it does not mean the water was bad, and it does not mean the water was fine. Notices and reports covers public notices and the annual Consumer Confidence Report.
Status. “Back in compliance” means the state recorded a return to compliance. “Period ended” means the violation's compliance period is over but no return to compliance was ever filed, which is common in older records. EPA's federal copy lags state records by months, so call the utility for anything current.