Mount Ascutney MHP

PWSID: VT0005342

1 active violation (non-health-based)
This system has unresolved violations related to monitoring, reporting, or procedural requirements, but none involve contaminant levels exceeding EPA health limits.

This system has more violations on record than 86% of water systems in Vermont.

Violation trend: 0.6 per year over the last 5 years, down from 1.2 per year in the previous 5.

System Details

Population Served42
Service Connections16
Water SourceGroundwater
System TypeCommunity Water System
OwnerPrivate
StatusActive
CityColchester
EPA ZIP on File05446

Areas Served

  • Windsor, Windsor County

Lead & Copper Testing

ContaminantLevelEPA Action LevelStatus
Lead (90th percentile)0.0042 mg/L0.015 mg/LBelow Action Level
Lead (90th percentile)0.0034 mg/L0.015 mg/LBelow Action Level
Lead (90th percentile)0.0020 mg/L0.015 mg/LBelow Action Level
Lead (90th percentile)0.0000 mg/L0.015 mg/LBelow Action Level

1 Active Violations

ContaminantViolationDateHealth-BasedStatus
5000MR
Measured: 0 mg/L
1999-01-01Open

Violation History (38 total)

ContaminantViolationDateHealth-BasedStatus
8000MON2024-11-01 MajorAcknowledged
8000MON2024-11-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
8000MON2024-11-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2950MR2021-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2950MR2021-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2456MR2021-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2456MR2021-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
8000MCL2020-07-01YesReturned to Compliance
3014MR2018-08-06 MajorReturned to Compliance
2378MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2380MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2955MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2964MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2968MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2969MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2976MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2977MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2979MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2980MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2981MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2982MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2983MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2984MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2985MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2987MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2989MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2990MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2991MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2992MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
2996MR2013-01-01 MajorReturned to Compliance
7000Other2008-07-01Returned to Compliance
5000MR1999-01-01Returned to Compliance
5000MR1997-01-01Returned to Compliance
3100MR1993-05-01Returned to Compliance
3100MCL1992-09-01YesReturned to Compliance
3100MR1991-11-01Returned to Compliance
3100MCL1991-10-01YesReturned to Compliance

Understanding This Water System's Record

Mount Ascutney MHP is a community water system water system that draws from groundwater sources and serves a population of 42 in Colchester, Vermont. This page shows its complete compliance history as reported to the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), the federal database that tracks every public water system in the United States.

What Do These Violations Mean?

Health-based violations mean the system exceeded an EPA maximum contaminant level (MCL) or failed to provide required treatment. These indicate potential health risks from contaminants like lead, arsenic, bacteria, nitrates, or disinfection byproducts. Non-health-based violations involve monitoring, reporting, or procedural requirements — the system missed a testing deadline or failed to notify customers, but contaminant levels were not necessarily unsafe.

What Should You Do?

Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) that details test results and any violations. If your system has active health-based violations, consider a certified water filter rated for the specific contaminants involved. The contaminant guides on this site explain health risks and filter options for common pollutants. For the most current results, contact your water utility directly — EPA data can lag weeks or months behind real-time testing.