Community Water System · PWSID AZ0403037

Greenehaven Water Company

Serves 807 peopleGroundwaterOwner: PrivateTucson, Arizona
Nothing open that measures the water, but 1 open testing or paperwork violation.

A missed test is not evidence of bad water. It also is not evidence of good water: for that period nobody checked.

On record since 2002: 25 violations. 1 over the limit · 13 missed or late tests · 11 notices or reports. Most recent began 2024-07-12.

For this year's test results, ask the utility for its annual Consumer Confidence Report. Every community system must publish one.

1Over the limit
0Treatment lapse
13Missed or late test
11Notice or report1 open

More violations on record than 71% of active water systems in Arizona. Small systems with no staff chemist often rack up missed-test violations; big utilities rarely do.

The record, year by year

2002 · Notice or report: 12003 · Notice or report: 12004 · Notice or report: 120052009 · Missed or late test: 120102012 · Notice or report: 12013 · Notice or report: 12014 · Missed or late test: 12014 · Notice or report: 120152016 · Over the limit: 12016 · Missed or late test: 12017 · Notice or report: 12018 · Notice or report: 12020 · Missed or late test: 120202023 · Missed or late test: 72023 · Missed or late test: 72023 · Missed or late test: 72023 · Missed or late test: 72023 · Missed or late test: 72023 · Missed or late test: 72023 · Missed or late test: 72023 · Notice or report: 22023 · Notice or report: 22024 · Missed or late test: 22024 · Missed or late test: 22024 · Notice or report: 12025
One square = one violation, by the year it began. Empty columns are years with nothing on EPA's record.
4% over the limit · 152% missed or late test · 1344% notice or report · 11

Across Arizona, 65% of violations are missed or late tests and 5% are water over a limit.

Lead & copper at the tap

Utilities sample taps in homes most likely to have lead pipes, and report the 90th-percentile result: 9 in 10 homes sampled came in at or below this number. Above the red line (the action level) the utility must act. The action level is not a safe level; EPA's health goal for lead is zero. EPA's file does not date these results, so they are shown highest first.

Lead, 90th percentile 10 results on file · action level 15 ppb

34 ppb
34 ppb
3.7 ppb
3.7 ppb
0 ppb
0 ppb
0 ppb
0 ppb
0 ppb
0 ppb

Open now (1)

  1. 2024-07-12Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen

Every violation on record

  1. 2024-07-12Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
  2. 2024-04-02Lead and Copper RuleLead Consumer NoticeBack in compliance
  3. 2024-02-01Revised Total Coliform RuleMONPeriod ended · no return to compliance on file
  4. 2023-10-02Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Inadequate ReportingBack in compliance
  5. 2023-10-01Lead and Copper RuleLead Consumer NoticeBack in compliance
  6. 2023-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
  7. 2023-07-01Lead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/RBack in compliance
  8. 2023-01-01CalciumWater Quality Parameter M/RBack in compliance
  9. 2023-01-01Temperature (Centigrade)Water Quality Parameter M/RBack in compliance
  10. 2023-01-01Alkalinity, TotalWater Quality Parameter M/RBack in compliance
  11. 2023-01-01pHWater Quality Parameter M/RBack in compliance
  12. 2023-01-01Conductivity @ 25 C Umhos/CmWater Quality Parameter M/RBack in compliance
  13. 2020-01-01Lead and Copper RuleLead Consumer NoticeBack in compliance
  14. 2018-10-01Revised Total Coliform RuleRPTBack in compliance
  15. 2017-09-01Revised Total Coliform RuleRPTBack in compliance
  16. 2016-10-01Lead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/RBack in compliance
  17. 2016-10-01Revised Total Coliform RuleMCLBack in compliance
  18. 2014-10-01Lead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/RBack in compliance
  19. 2014-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
  20. 2013-10-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Inadequate ReportingBack in compliance
  21. 2012-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
  22. 2009-10-01Lead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/RBack in compliance
  23. 2004-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
  24. 2003-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
  25. 2002-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance

System details

Population served807
Service connections285
Water sourceGroundwater
System typeCommunity Water System
OwnerPrivate
StatusActive
CityTucson
EPA ZIP on file85754

Areas served

  • Page, Coconino County

Reading this record

Greenehaven Water Company is a community water system that draws from groundwater and serves about 807 people in Tucson, Arizona. Everything above comes from the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), where states report every violation by every public water system.

Four kinds of violation. Only one is a measurement of the water: over the limit means a test came back above a legal maximum (an MCL). A treatment lapse means a required protective step was not done, such as disinfection, filtration, fixing a defect an inspector found, or filing a lead-pipe inventory. A missed or late test means a required test was skipped or never reported. That is the most common kind, and the most misread: it does not mean the water was bad, and it does not mean the water was fine. Notices and reports covers public notices and the annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Status. “Back in compliance” means the state recorded a return to compliance. “Period ended” means the violation's compliance period is over but no return to compliance was ever filed, which is common in older records. EPA's federal copy lags state records by months, so call the utility for anything current.