Finch Hill Water Co
A missed test is not evidence of bad water. It also is not evidence of good water: for that period nobody checked.
On record since 2004: 97 violations. 4 over the limit · 29 missed or late tests · 64 notices or reports. Most recent began 2025-10-01.
For this year's test results, ask the utility for its annual Consumer Confidence Report. Every community system must publish one.
More violations on record than 95% of active water systems in Pennsylvania. Small systems with no staff chemist often rack up missed-test violations; big utilities rarely do.
The record, year by year
Across Pennsylvania, 71% of violations are missed or late tests and 2% are water over a limit.
Open now (33)
- 2025-10-01Lead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/ROpen
- 2013-07-11Public Notice ×30PN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2008-02-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2007-11-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
Every violation on record
- 2025-10-01Lead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/ROpen
- 2025-02-01Groundwater RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Unfilt/GWR)Back in compliance
- 2023-09-11Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2023-04-01ArsenicMonitoring, Check/Repeat/ConfirmationPeriod ended · no return to compliance on file
- 2022-10-01Lead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/RBack in compliance
- 2022-08-01Revised Total Coliform RuleMONPeriod ended · no return to compliance on file
- 2022-01-01StyreneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01EthylbenzeneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01TolueneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01BenzeneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01ChlorobenzeneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01TetrachloroethyleneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-011,1,2-TrichloroethaneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01TrichloroethyleneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-011,2-DichloropropaneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01Carbon tetrachlorideMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-011,1,1-TrichloroethaneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-011,2-DichloroethaneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01trans-1,2-DichloroethyleneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-011,1-DichloroethyleneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01p-DichlorobenzeneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01o-DichlorobenzeneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01DichloromethaneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01Xylenes, TotalMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2022-01-01cis-1,2-DichloroethyleneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
Show the other 43 entries
- 2022-01-011,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneMonitoring, RegularBack in compliance
- 2021-10-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Inadequate ReportingBack in compliance
- 2020-05-01Groundwater RuleMonitoring of Treatment (SWTR-Unfilt/GWR)Back in compliance
- 2018-10-01ChlorineMonitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2018-07-01Trihalomethanes (TTHM)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2018-07-01Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Monitoring and Reporting (DBP)Back in compliance
- 2017-10-01ArsenicMCL, Averagemeasured 0.0110 MG/LBack in compliance
- 2017-07-01ArsenicMCL, Averagemeasured 0.0110 MG/LBack in compliance
- 2017-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2016-04-01Revised Total Coliform RuleOtherBack in compliance
- 2013-07-11Public Notice ×30PN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2013-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2012-08-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2012-05-11Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2012-02-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2011-11-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2011-08-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2011-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2011-05-11Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2011-02-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2010-11-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2010-08-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2010-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2010-05-11Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2010-02-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2009-11-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2009-08-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2009-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2009-05-11Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2009-02-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2008-11-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2008-08-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2008-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2008-02-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2007-11-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2007-10-01ArsenicMCL, Averagemeasured 0.0110 MG/LBack in compliance
- 2007-07-01ArsenicMCL, Averagemeasured 0.0120 MG/LBack in compliance
- 2007-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2007-02-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2006-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2005-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2004-10-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Inadequate ReportingBack in compliance
- 2004-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
System details
| Population served | 150 |
| Service connections | 38 |
| Water source | Groundwater |
| System type | Community Water System |
| Owner | Private |
| Status | Active |
| City | Greenfield Township |
| EPA ZIP on file | 18407 |
Areas served
- Lackawanna County
Reading this record
Finch Hill Water Co is a community water system that draws from groundwater and serves about 150 people in Greenfield Township, Pennsylvania. Everything above comes from the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), where states report every violation by every public water system.
Four kinds of violation. Only one is a measurement of the water: over the limit means a test came back above a legal maximum (an MCL). A treatment lapse means a required protective step was not done, such as disinfection, filtration, fixing a defect an inspector found, or filing a lead-pipe inventory. A missed or late test means a required test was skipped or never reported. That is the most common kind, and the most misread: it does not mean the water was bad, and it does not mean the water was fine. Notices and reports covers public notices and the annual Consumer Confidence Report.
Status. “Back in compliance” means the state recorded a return to compliance. “Period ended” means the violation's compliance period is over but no return to compliance was ever filed, which is common in older records. EPA's federal copy lags state records by months, so call the utility for anything current.