Chapel Grove MHP
A missed test is not evidence of bad water. It also is not evidence of good water: for that period nobody checked.
On record since 2005: 40 violations. 4 missed or late tests · 36 notices or reports. Most recent began 2022-01-01.
None of them is a measurement of contaminated water.
For this year's test results, ask the utility for its annual Consumer Confidence Report. Every community system must publish one.
More violations on record than 96% of active water systems in North Carolina. Small systems with no staff chemist often rack up missed-test violations; big utilities rarely do.
The record, year by year
Across North Carolina, 39% of violations are missed or late tests and 2% are water over a limit.
Lead & copper at the tap
Utilities sample taps in homes most likely to have lead pipes, and report the 90th-percentile result: 9 in 10 homes sampled came in at or below this number. Above the red line (the action level) the utility must act. The action level is not a safe level; EPA's health goal for lead is zero. EPA's file does not date these results, so they are shown highest first.
Lead, 90th percentile 3 results on file · action level 15 ppb
Open now (5)
- 2015-06-19Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2015-05-23Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2015-03-28Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2015-03-08Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2009-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportOpen
Every violation on record
- 2022-01-01Lead and Copper RuleLead Consumer NoticeBack in compliance
- 2015-09-26Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2015-08-27Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2015-08-08Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2015-07-31Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2015-07-11Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2015-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2015-06-27Public Notice ×2PN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2015-06-19Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2015-05-23Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2015-05-14Public Notice ×2PN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2015-04-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2015-03-28Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2015-03-08Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationOpen
- 2015-02-20Public Notice ×2PN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2014-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2014-04-18Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2012-10-01Lead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/RBack in compliance
- 2011-11-24Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2011-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2010-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2009-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportOpen
- 2009-05-30Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2009-05-10Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2009-04-26Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
Show the other 12 entries
- 2008-09-25Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2008-08-22Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2008-07-25Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2008-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2008-06-12Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2008-01-19Public NoticePN Violation for NPDWR ViolationBack in compliance
- 2007-10-01Lead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/RBack in compliance
- 2007-10-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Inadequate ReportingBack in compliance
- 2007-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
- 2006-10-01Lead and Copper RuleFollow-up Or Routine LCR Tap M/RBack in compliance
- 2005-10-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Inadequate ReportingBack in compliance
- 2005-07-01Consumer Confidence RuleCCR Complete Failure to ReportBack in compliance
System details
| Population served | 110 |
| Service connections | 34 |
| Water source | Groundwater |
| System type | Community Water System |
| Owner | Private |
| Status | Active |
| City | Kings Mountain |
| EPA ZIP on file | 28086 |
Areas served
- Gastonia, Gaston County
Reading this record
Chapel Grove MHP is a community water system that draws from groundwater and serves about 110 people in Kings Mountain, North Carolina. Everything above comes from the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), where states report every violation by every public water system.
Four kinds of violation. Only one is a measurement of the water: over the limit means a test came back above a legal maximum (an MCL). A treatment lapse means a required protective step was not done, such as disinfection, filtration, fixing a defect an inspector found, or filing a lead-pipe inventory. A missed or late test means a required test was skipped or never reported. That is the most common kind, and the most misread: it does not mean the water was bad, and it does not mean the water was fine. Notices and reports covers public notices and the annual Consumer Confidence Report.
Status. “Back in compliance” means the state recorded a return to compliance. “Period ended” means the violation's compliance period is over but no return to compliance was ever filed, which is common in older records. EPA's federal copy lags state records by months, so call the utility for anything current.