Adams, Village of
PWSID: NE3106712
This system has no unresolved violations. The most recent violation on record was 1998-01-01.
This system has more violations on record than 90% of water systems in Nebraska.
System Details
| Population Served | 606 |
| Service Connections | 272 |
| Water Source | Groundwater |
| System Type | Community Water System |
| Owner | Local Government |
| Status | Active |
| City | Adams |
| EPA ZIP on File | 68301-0041 |
Areas Served
- Adams, Gage County
Lead & Copper Testing
| Contaminant | Level | EPA Action Level | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copper (90th percentile) | 1.7650 mg/L | 1.300 mg/L | Exceeds Action Level |
| Copper (90th percentile) | 1.6950 mg/L | 1.300 mg/L | Exceeds Action Level |
| Copper (90th percentile) | 1.3800 mg/L | 1.300 mg/L | Exceeds Action Level |
| Lead (90th percentile) | 0.0016 mg/L | 0.015 mg/L | Below Action Level |
| Lead (90th percentile) | 0.0015 mg/L | 0.015 mg/L | Below Action Level |
| Lead (90th percentile) | 0.0013 mg/L | 0.015 mg/L | Below Action Level |
| Lead (90th percentile) | 0.0013 mg/L | 0.015 mg/L | Below Action Level |
| Lead (90th percentile) | 0.0007 mg/L | 0.015 mg/L | Below Action Level |
| Lead (90th percentile) | 0.0006 mg/L | 0.015 mg/L | Below Action Level |
| Lead (90th percentile) | 0.0003 mg/L | 0.015 mg/L | Below Action Level |
| Lead (90th percentile) | 0.0003 mg/L | 0.015 mg/L | Below Action Level |
Violation History (13 total)
| Contaminant | Violation | Date | Health-Based | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5000 | TT | 1998-01-01 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 3000 | MCL Measured: 2.00 mg/L (limit: 1.00 mg/L) | 1988-01-01 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 3000 | MCL Measured: 2.00 mg/L (limit: 1.00 mg/L) | 1988-01-01 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 3000 | MCL Measured: 2.00 mg/L (limit: 1.00 mg/L) | 1988-01-01 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 3000 | MCL Measured: 0 mg/L (limit: 1.00 mg/L) | 1986-10-01 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 3000 | MCL Measured: 0 mg/L (limit: 1.00 mg/L) | 1986-10-01 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 3000 | MCL Measured: 0 mg/L (limit: 1.00 mg/L) | 1986-10-01 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 1040 | MCL Measured: 13.60 mg/L (limit: 10.00 mg/L) | 1986-10-01 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 1040 | MCL Measured: 13.60 mg/L (limit: 10.00 mg/L) | 1986-10-01 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 1040 | MCL Measured: 13.60 mg/L (limit: 10.00 mg/L) | 1986-10-01 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 1040 | MCL Measured: 13.60 mg/L (limit: 10.00 mg/L) | 1984-10-23 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 1040 | MCL Measured: 13.60 mg/L (limit: 10.00 mg/L) | 1984-10-23 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
| 1040 | MCL Measured: 13.60 mg/L (limit: 10.00 mg/L) | 1984-10-23 | Yes | Returned to Compliance |
Understanding This Water System's Record
Adams, Village of is a community water system water system that draws from groundwater sources and serves a population of 606 in Adams, Nebraska. This page shows its complete compliance history as reported to the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), the federal database that tracks every public water system in the United States.
What Do These Violations Mean?
Health-based violations mean the system exceeded an EPA maximum contaminant level (MCL) or failed to provide required treatment. These indicate potential health risks from contaminants like lead, arsenic, bacteria, nitrates, or disinfection byproducts. Non-health-based violations involve monitoring, reporting, or procedural requirements — the system missed a testing deadline or failed to notify customers, but contaminant levels were not necessarily unsafe.
What Should You Do?
Your water utility is required to publish an annual Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) that details test results and any violations. If your system has active health-based violations, consider a certified water filter rated for the specific contaminants involved. The contaminant guides on this site explain health risks and filter options for common pollutants. For the most current results, contact your water utility directly — EPA data can lag weeks or months behind real-time testing.